« Back to Summary
What model do you prefer for assigning area chairs to papers? (multiple selections possible)
#Response DateI have the following alternative proposal:
1Jun 10, 2010 7:05 PMNo opinion. All past year's ICML reviews have been fine with me.
2Jun 10, 2010 7:06 PMIn general the first two options are fine but there is one very big caveat: there should be the ability for the authors to write in their own keywords. A certain (newish) topic did not have a keyword, and so papers on it keep getting reviewer mismatch.
3Jun 10, 2010 7:24 PMFollow the nips strategy this year.
4Jun 10, 2010 11:27 PMThis year's model without assignment of areas being public.
5Jun 10, 2010 11:36 PMWhy not use machine learning to assign papers?
6Jun 12, 2010 12:09 AMI suggest to assign two area chairs for each paper so in the second phase they need to discuss and reach a consensus on selection the additional reviewers.