| 1 | Jun 10, 2010 7:15 PM | I would support keeping the acceptance rate constant at around 25% |
| 2 | Jun 10, 2010 7:29 PM | would be nice not to look at numbers but only at quality |
| 3 | Jun 10, 2010 7:31 PM | and a poster session. |
| 4 | Jun 10, 2010 8:09 PM | an extra day with about the same number of papers would be ok too (it would allow to see more presentations) |
| 5 | Jun 11, 2010 12:19 AM | Papers should not be acceped based on counts but rather on the quality of the paper. |
| 6 | Jun 11, 2010 3:07 AM | and reduce parallel tracks by including accepted papers presented only as posters |
| 7 | Jun 14, 2010 10:11 AM | quality of papers should be the criteria, not available time |
| 8 | Jun 25, 2010 6:59 AM | It might be worth considering making most of the contributed papers posters, with poster highlight sessions in which the authors summarize papers |