« Back to Summary
With ca. 160 accepted and invited papers, the program currently fills 5 parallel tracks on three days to the limit. Should we allow the conference to grow further?
#Response DateOther suggestions?
1Jun 10, 2010 7:15 PMI would support keeping the acceptance rate constant at around 25%
2Jun 10, 2010 7:29 PMwould be nice not to look at numbers but only at quality
3Jun 10, 2010 7:31 PMand a poster session.
4Jun 10, 2010 8:09 PMan extra day with about the same number of papers would be ok too (it would allow to see more presentations)
5Jun 11, 2010 12:19 AMPapers should not be acceped based on counts but rather on the quality of the paper.
6Jun 11, 2010 3:07 AMand reduce parallel tracks by including accepted papers presented only as posters
7Jun 14, 2010 10:11 AMquality of papers should be the criteria, not available time
8Jun 25, 2010 6:59 AMIt might be worth considering making most of the contributed papers posters, with poster highlight sessions in which the authors summarize papers