« Back to Summary
With ca. 160 accepted and invited papers, the program currently fills 5 parallel tracks on three days to the limit. Should we allow the conference to grow further?
#Response DateOther suggestions?
1Jun 10, 2010 7:15 PMI would support keeping the acceptance rate constant at around 25%
2Jun 10, 2010 8:34 PMAs an attendee I LOVE spotlight+poster, but this has less prestige. Maybe assign some papers to spotlight+poster *randomly* to keep prestige?
3Jun 10, 2010 10:52 PMShould have some papers presented in plannery sessions
4Jun 10, 2010 11:17 PMvideo tape all sessions and place them online in real time.
5Jun 11, 2010 12:19 AMPapers should not be acceped based on counts but rather on the quality of the paper.
6Jun 11, 2010 3:07 AMand reduce parallel tracks by including accepted papers presented only as posters
7Jun 11, 2010 1:55 PMaccept papers that deserve to be accepted
8Jun 12, 2010 4:05 AMICML rejects too many good papers
9Jun 12, 2010 11:01 AMintroduce poster papers, but also reduce the number of tracks
10Jun 12, 2010 3:36 PMWe should accept all the papers that the reviewers feel are of high enough quality & importance, and find a way to fit them in.
11Jun 25, 2010 6:59 AMIt might be worth considering making most of the contributed papers posters, with poster highlight sessions in which the authors summarize papers