| 1 | Jun 10, 2010 7:01 PM | COLT, NIPS, theory, algorithms |
| 2 | Jun 10, 2010 7:12 PM | NIPS |
| 3 | Jun 10, 2010 7:20 PM | NIPS, AISTATS (Bayesian inference) |
| 4 | Jun 10, 2010 8:24 PM | NIPS, topic models |
| 5 | Jun 10, 2010 8:25 PM | NIPS |
| 6 | Jun 10, 2010 8:38 PM | NIPS |
| 7 | Jun 10, 2010 9:15 PM | COLT, NIPS, ECML
Reinforcement Learning |
| 8 | Jun 10, 2010 10:02 PM | ACL, NAACL: The NLPers tend to write longers reviews with more details, and be more polite. |
| 9 | Jun 11, 2010 1:31 AM | NIPS2009, machine learning |
| 10 | Jun 11, 2010 5:17 AM | NIPS |
| 11 | Jun 11, 2010 6:45 AM | NIPS |
| 12 | Jun 11, 2010 8:09 AM | CVPR, ICCV, NIPS. Computer Vision and Machine Learning |
| 13 | Jun 11, 2010 8:37 AM | NIPS tends to be somewhat better. AISTATS this year was similarly
bad. |
| 14 | Jun 11, 2010 1:26 PM | UAI |
| 15 | Jun 11, 2010 1:36 PM | AAAI in unsupervised learning |
| 16 | Jun 11, 2010 2:31 PM | Definitely more extensive reviews than what I'm used to getting from NIPS. |
| 17 | Jun 11, 2010 3:07 PM | NIPS; boosting |
| 18 | Jun 11, 2010 3:11 PM | NIPS |
| 19 | Jun 11, 2010 10:55 PM | NIPS, for example. |
| 20 | Jun 11, 2010 11:02 PM | Much better than kdd and ilp
Roughly same at aaai, ecml, uai
area is statistical relational learning |
| 21 | Jun 12, 2010 3:57 AM | NIPS, CVPR, AISTATS |
| 22 | Jun 14, 2010 5:53 AM | NIPS, graphical models and continuous time models. |
| 23 | Jun 14, 2010 9:31 AM | UAI |
| 24 | Jun 14, 2010 9:14 PM | No experience with other conferences |