« Back to Summary
What model do you prefer for assigning reviewers to papers? (multiple selections possible)
#Response DateI have the following alternative proposal:
1Jun 10, 2010 8:38 PMReviewers submit sample papers, key words and citations are extracted, and the system does smart matching. But the second phase of manually assigning some reviewers works well.
2Jun 10, 2010 10:42 PMIt is important to be clear on whether first phase is only cursory or whether full reviews are expected.
3Jun 11, 2010 1:20 PMUnclear
4Jun 11, 2010 1:33 PMAllow (perhaps encourage?) Phase 1 authors to indicate (when applicable) they may not be approrpriate to review a particular paper after assignments have been made and replace them with a suitable substitute.
5Jun 13, 2010 10:07 PMhttp://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=122784