« Back to Summary
What model do you prefer for assigning area chairs to papers? (multiple selections possible)
#Response DateI have the following alternative proposal:
1Jun 10, 2010 8:38 PMArea chairs submit sample papers, key words and citations are extracted, and the system does smart matching.
2Jun 10, 2010 9:07 PMprogram chairs assign manually, with keyword/ bidding input
3Jun 10, 2010 10:00 PMI like the NIPS experiment of using AC's publication PDFs to automatically match with submissions. This is essentially 2) above, but with much more information available to the matching program.
4Jun 11, 2010 1:20 PMUnclear
5Jun 12, 2010 12:09 AMI suggest to assign two area chairs for each paper so in the second phase they need to discuss and reach a consensus on selection the additional reviewers.
6Jun 13, 2010 10:07 PMhttp://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=122784