1 | Jun 10, 2010 7:16 PM | 1) it is incredibly slow and totally no fun just because of this
2) the export format is some clumsy xml so no simple offline reviewing is possible
3) there is no good overview for an area chair / reviewer and it is difficult to rank papers |
2 | Jun 10, 2010 8:37 PM | make it faster!!!! |
3 | Jun 10, 2010 8:53 PM | Could have been more obvious (i.e., more visible) when the submission deadlines for various steps were (e.g., camera ready version) |
4 | Jun 10, 2010 9:11 PM | Better offline reviewing |
5 | Jun 10, 2010 10:15 PM | The settings on CMT appear to be confusing to many conference managers, as often unexpected things happen (lack of confirmation emails for submission, deadlines which "lock out" reviews, etc.) I can't remember if anything happened for ICML; this is a general observation. |
6 | Jun 11, 2010 1:38 AM | Add a clock about the deadline time at the submission system or website |
7 | Jun 11, 2010 2:35 AM | inviting reviewers was difficult, just like assigning reviewers to papers. in general, the system was quite slow, in some case loading long lists of names that could be avoided. (I forgot most of the issues, and the specifics, but there were definitely issues). Also, I am using Firefox and some functionality did not work on it. |
8 | Jun 11, 2010 8:49 AM | One simple thing:
- Get all my assignments out in TEXT FORMAT
- Allow to import all my decisions in TEXT FORMAT
- If you insist on this clicking orgy: At LEAST allow me to sort
entries according to any field. And show me ALL of them
Remember: Your system is real slow, at least here in Europe
- And please don't tell me "my request is taken seriously" if it just
goes to the nul device
I am not using MS products, because they waste everybodys time.
Certainly I am not using Excel. |
9 | Jun 11, 2010 3:13 PM | add time clock at the website |
10 | Jun 11, 2010 7:22 PM | no |
11 | Jun 12, 2010 4:02 AM | The pull-down menus fail in some browsers.
Some options are unclear. |
12 | Jun 12, 2010 1:30 PM | Make Author names possible to edit (even if the email-address does not change) |
13 | Jun 13, 2010 10:13 PM | The paper ids should be random. Some people speculate that low paper ids/high paper ids have a bias on reviewers. |
14 | Jun 14, 2010 7:41 PM | a better control panel |
15 | Jun 17, 2010 7:14 PM | countdown to deadline(s) |