| 1 | Jun 10, 2010 7:01 PM | COLT, NIPS, theory, algorithms |
| 2 | Jun 10, 2010 7:07 PM | NIPS AISTATS |
| 3 | Jun 10, 2010 8:27 PM | ECML-PKDD, KDD |
| 4 | Jun 10, 2010 10:02 PM | ACL, NAACL: The NLPers tend to write longers reviews with more details, and be more polite. |
| 5 | Jun 10, 2010 10:48 PM | NIPS, Siggraph. |
| 6 | Jun 10, 2010 10:51 PM | I find NIPS marginally worse as far as craziness. COLT reviewers seem to be stronger, but their viewpoint often doesn't make sense w.r.t. what is significant work. |
| 7 | Jun 11, 2010 1:09 AM | ECML/PKDD |
| 8 | Jun 11, 2010 3:03 AM | AAAI and SDM machine learning papers |
| 9 | Jun 11, 2010 8:42 AM | ECML - Machine learning |
| 10 | Jun 11, 2010 1:03 PM | Again, due to variance I don't dare to generalize... |
| 11 | Jun 14, 2010 10:06 AM | KDD'09 |