« Back to Summary
What model do you prefer for assigning area chairs to papers? (multiple selections possible)
#Response DateI have the following alternative proposal:
1Jun 10, 2010 8:38 PMArea chairs submit sample papers, key words and citations are extracted, and the system does smart matching.
2Jun 10, 2010 10:00 PMI like the NIPS experiment of using AC's publication PDFs to automatically match with submissions. This is essentially 2) above, but with much more information available to the matching program.
3Jun 11, 2010 8:55 AMOne negative point of the publicity of area chairs is that I encountered a paper as a reviewer at ECML which was an exact copy of a rejected ICML paper. I reposted the given reviews as my review and probably gave away my identity that way. (I might have lost some friends ... :-))