ÿþ<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Comment Summary</title><link media="all" href="css/Export.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" charset="utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" /></head><body style="margin-left:15px;margin-right:15px;margin-top:15px;"><a href="SurveySummary.html" class="NormBtn">&laquo; Back to Summary</a><div style="margin-top:15px;"><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="0"><thead><tr><th class="hdr" colspan="8">Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from those at related conferences?</th></tr><tr><th class="hdr dflt">#</th><th class="hdr dflt">Response&nbsp;Date</th><th class="hdr dflt" style="width:80%;">What conference are you comparing to and what is the subject area?</th></tr></thead><tbody id="xtrows"><tr><td>1</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:06 PM</td><td>this year's ecml/pkdd</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:07 PM</td><td>NIPS AISTATS</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:09 PM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:10 PM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:12 PM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:15 PM</td><td>Reviews everywhere have a lot of variance. Hard to compare to an 'average'.</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:20 PM</td><td>NIPS, AISTATS (Bayesian inference)</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:21 PM</td><td>KDD</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:21 PM</td><td>aaai</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:27 PM</td><td>KDD</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 8:13 PM</td><td>Again, I was a reviewer - and I guess this page is targeted toward authors</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 8:25 PM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 8:56 PM</td><td>ECML, AAMAS, ECAI reinforcememt learning</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 9:05 PM</td><td>ecml pkdd 2010</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 9:06 PM</td><td>ECML, GECCO, AAMAS, AAAI Reinforcement learning</td></tr><tr><td>16</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 9:15 PM</td><td>COLT, NIPS, ECML Reinforcement Learning</td></tr><tr><td>17</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 9:56 PM</td><td>UAI 2010. Subject Area: Gaussian Processes</td></tr><tr><td>18</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 10:47 PM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>19</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 11:17 PM</td><td>NIPS (Reinforcement Learning)</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 11:29 PM</td><td>NIPS (slightly better), COLT (substantially better).</td></tr><tr><td>21</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 11:46 PM</td><td>NIPS 2009</td></tr><tr><td>22</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 11:59 PM</td><td>E.g., COLT 2010, reinforcement learning</td></tr><tr><td>23</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 6:45 AM</td><td>NIPS</td></tr><tr><td>24</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 7:47 AM</td><td>SIGKDD - classification, ensembles</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 8:02 AM</td><td>ECML IDA</td></tr><tr><td>26</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 8:37 AM</td><td>NIPS tends to be somewhat better. AISTATS this year was similarly bad.</td></tr><tr><td>27</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 10:28 AM</td><td>ECML, ECAI</td></tr><tr><td>28</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 10:32 AM</td><td>AAMAS (autonomous agents)</td></tr><tr><td>29</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 11:32 AM</td><td>ACM KDD, ECML PKDD</td></tr><tr><td>30</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 1:26 PM</td><td>UAI</td></tr><tr><td>31</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 1:54 PM</td><td>ECML, KDD, ECAI</td></tr><tr><td>32</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 11:02 PM</td><td>Much better than kdd and ilp Roughly same at aaai, ecml, uai area is statistical relational learning</td></tr><tr><td>33</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 12, 2010 11:14 AM</td><td>NIPS, AiSTAT</td></tr><tr><td>34</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 12, 2010 9:38 PM</td><td>ECML, NIPS (machine learning)</td></tr><tr><td>35</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 13, 2010 1:54 PM</td><td>nips</td></tr><tr><td>36</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 14, 2010 9:31 AM</td><td>UAI</td></tr><tr><td>37</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 25, 2010 6:44 AM</td><td>NIPS, KDD, SDM, ICDM</td></tr></tbody></table></div></body></html>