ÿþ<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Result Summary for Survey:ICML 2010 Feedback</title><link media="all" href="css/Export.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="1" /></head><body><div style="padding:0 0 1.25em 0;font:bold 1.333em Verdana;">ICML 2010 Feedback</div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">1. Are you an author of a *rejected* ICML 2010 paper?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>288</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>0</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Yes</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:100%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">100,0%</td><td class="cnttop">288</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;">&nbsp;</td><td class="freq">0,0%</td><td class="cnt">0</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">2. Are you going to attend ICML 2010 in Haifa?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>288</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>0</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:13.5416666666667%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">13,5%</td><td class="cnt">39</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>No</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:86.4583333333333%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">86,5%</td><td class="cnttop">249</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="2_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">My main reason for not attending is:</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">173</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">3. What model do you prefer for assigning area chairs to papers? (multiple selections possible)</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>230</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>58</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Authors supply area keywords, and area chairs bid on papers primarily in the areas they agreed to cover. The assignment of area chairs to areas is public to the authors. (this year's model)</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:65.2173913043478%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">65,2%</td><td class="cnttop">150</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Authors supply area keywords, and the system matches area chairs to papers by keyword overlap.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:24.3478260869565%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">24,3%</td><td class="cnt">56</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Authors bid on area chairs. (last year's model)</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:22.1739130434783%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">22,2%</td><td class="cnt">51</td></tr><tr><td class="rowLabel"><a class="TextBtn" href="3_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">I have the following alternative proposal:</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:2.60869565217391%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq notranslate">2,6%</td><td class="cnt notranslate">6</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">4. What model do you prefer for assigning reviewers to papers? (multiple selections possible)</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>235</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>53</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Two-phase model mixing bidding and manual assignment. In Phase I, reviewer bidding is used to assign two reviewers to each paper. In Phase II, area chairs manually assign additional reviewers based on the Phase I reviews and the author rebuttal. (this year's model)</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:50.6382978723404%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">50,6%</td><td class="cnttop">119</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Two-phase model like above, but area chairs manually assign reviewers in both phases.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:21.2765957446809%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">21,3%</td><td class="cnt">50</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Single-phase model, where reviewers are assigned to papers based on their bids.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:19.1489361702128%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">19,1%</td><td class="cnt">45</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Single-phase model, where reviewers are manually assigned by the area chairs.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:15.3191489361702%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">15,3%</td><td class="cnt">36</td></tr><tr><td class="rowLabel"><a class="TextBtn" href="4_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">I have the following alternative proposal:</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:7.23404255319149%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq notranslate">7,2%</td><td class="cnt notranslate">17</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">5. What reviewing model do you prefer?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>238</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>50</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>double-blind (reviewers do not know the authors, and vice versa) (as this year)</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:80.672268907563%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">80,7%</td><td class="cnttop">192</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>single-blind (reviewers know the authors, but authors don't know the reviewers)</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:10.9243697478992%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">10,9%</td><td class="cnt">26</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>open (reviewers and authors know each other's identities)</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:8.40336134453782%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,4%</td><td class="cnt">20</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">6. Do you think the Phase I reviews were different in quality from the Phase II reviews?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>224</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>64</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Phase I substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:16.5178571428571%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">16,5%</td><td class="cnt">37</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Phase I slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:13.3928571428571%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">13,4%</td><td class="cnt">30</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Both were the same</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:41.5178571428571%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">41,5%</td><td class="cnttop">93</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Phase II slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:17.4107142857143%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">17,4%</td><td class="cnt">39</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Phase II substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:11.1607142857143%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">11,2%</td><td class="cnt">25</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">7. Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from the reviews at previous ICMLs?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>177</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>111</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ICML2010 substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:2.25988700564972%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">2,3%</td><td class="cnt">4</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ICML2010 slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.03954802259887%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,0%</td><td class="cnt">16</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>About the same</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:63.2768361581921%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">63,3%</td><td class="cnttop">112</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Previous ICMLs slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:15.819209039548%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">15,8%</td><td class="cnt">28</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Previous ICMLs substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.6045197740113%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,6%</td><td class="cnt">17</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="7_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">Additional comments:</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">37</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">8. Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from those at related conferences?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>218</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>70</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ICML2010 substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.63302752293578%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,6%</td><td class="cnt">21</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ICML2010 slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:18.348623853211%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">18,3%</td><td class="cnt">40</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>About the same</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:45.4128440366972%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">45,4%</td><td class="cnttop">99</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Other conferences slightly better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:17.8899082568807%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">17,9%</td><td class="cnt">39</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Other conferences substantially better</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:8.71559633027523%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,7%</td><td class="cnt">19</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="8_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">What conference are you comparing to and what is the subject area?</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">55</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">9. What do you think of early rejects by area chairs (i.e., rejecting a paper based on two reviews and author rebuttal)? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>233</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>55</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>I object to early rejects. Rejected papers should get at least three reviews.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:23.6051502145923%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">23,6%</td><td class="cnt">55</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>I support early rejects, but only in very clear cases (approximately 13% of submissions this year).</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:68.2403433476395%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">68,2%</td><td class="cnttop">159</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Area chairs should make more liberal use of early rejects.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:8.15450643776824%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,2%</td><td class="cnt">19</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">10. What do you think of early accepts (i.e., accepting a paper after only two reviews and author rebuttal)?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>233</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>55</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>We should not allow this (as it was this year).</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:56.2231759656652%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">56,2%</td><td class="cnttop">131</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>We should allow this for papers with exceptionally good reviews.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:43.7768240343348%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">43,8%</td><td class="cnt">102</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">11. Do you think the author feedback has an influence on the decision of acceptance/rejection?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>236</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>52</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Very strong influence.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:2.54237288135593%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">2,5%</td><td class="cnt">6</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Substantial influence.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.74576271186441%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,7%</td><td class="cnt">23</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Marginal influence.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:52.9661016949153%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">53,0%</td><td class="cnttop">125</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No influence.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:34.7457627118644%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">34,7%</td><td class="cnt">82</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">12. When do you think should authors be asked to provide their feedback?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>233</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>55</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>After Phase I of the reviewing process, so it can inform the selection of Phase II reviewers and is immediately available during the discussion. (this year's model)</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:42.0600858369099%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">42,1%</td><td class="cnttop">98</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>After Phase II of the reviewing process, so authors can respond to all reviews, not just the Phase I reviews.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:24.8927038626609%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">24,9%</td><td class="cnt">58</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Ask for author feedback both after Phase I and Phase II, even though the paper submission deadline would need to be moved to January 15.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:17.1673819742489%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">17,2%</td><td class="cnt">40</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Do not ask for author feedback at all.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.44206008583691%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,4%</td><td class="cnt">22</td></tr><tr><td class="rowLabel"><a class="TextBtn" href="12_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">I have the following alternative proposal:</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:6.43776824034335%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq notranslate">6,4%</td><td class="cnt notranslate">15</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">13. Do you think the majority of the reviews of your paper were </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>222</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>66</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>right to the point</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.90990990990991%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,9%</td><td class="cnt">22</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>high quality</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:45.045045045045%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">45,0%</td><td class="cnttop">100</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>low quality</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:31.0810810810811%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">31,1%</td><td class="cnt">69</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>the reviewers did not understand my paper</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:13.963963963964%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">14,0%</td><td class="cnt">31</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">14. How do you rate the length of the majority of the reviews? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>223</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>65</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>too long</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:2.69058295964126%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">2,7%</td><td class="cnt">6</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>just right</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:76.2331838565022%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">76,2%</td><td class="cnttop">170</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>too short</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:21.0762331838565%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">21,1%</td><td class="cnt">47</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">15. Do you think the reviewers read your feedback? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>227</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>61</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>yes, and they took it into consideration</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:8.37004405286344%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,4%</td><td class="cnt">19</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>yes, but they ignored it</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:21.5859030837004%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">21,6%</td><td class="cnt">49</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>I'm not sure</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:58.5903083700441%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">58,6%</td><td class="cnttop">133</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>certainly not</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:11.4537444933921%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">11,5%</td><td class="cnt">26</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">16. Do you think that the meta reviewer (area chair) adequately summarized the reviewers' opinions and made a right decision? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>218</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>70</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>yes</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:19.7247706422018%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">19,7%</td><td class="cnt">43</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>somewhat, but mostly OK</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:47.2477064220183%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">47,2%</td><td class="cnttop">103</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>no</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:25.2293577981651%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">25,2%</td><td class="cnt">55</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>there was no justification of the decision</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:7.79816513761468%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">7,8%</td><td class="cnt">17</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">17. How do you rate the length of the meta review(s)? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>217</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>71</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>too long</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:1.38248847926267%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">1,4%</td><td class="cnt">3</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>just right</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:65.8986175115207%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">65,9%</td><td class="cnttop">143</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>too short</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:32.7188940092166%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">32,7%</td><td class="cnt">71</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">18. Will you submit again to a future ICML conference? </span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>228</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>60</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>yes</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:67.1052631578947%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">67,1%</td><td class="cnttop">153</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>no</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:3.07017543859649%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">3,1%</td><td class="cnt">7</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>don't know yet</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:29.8245614035088%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">29,8%</td><td class="cnt">68</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">19. Which conference tool do you like best?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>141</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>147</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>CMT (this year)</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:85.8156028368794%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">85,8%</td><td class="cnttop">121</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>CyberChair</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:9.21985815602837%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">9,2%</td><td class="cnt">13</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>START</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:4.9645390070922%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">5,0%</td><td class="cnt">7</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="19_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">Other (please specify)</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">20</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">20. Did you find CMT</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>198</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>90</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>great</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:10.6060606060606%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">10,6%</td><td class="cnt">21</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>comfortable</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:37.8787878787879%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">37,9%</td><td class="cnt">75</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>o.k.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:41.9191919191919%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">41,9%</td><td class="cnttop">83</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>clumsy</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:6.06060606060606%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">6,1%</td><td class="cnt">12</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>awful</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:3.53535353535354%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">3,5%</td><td class="cnt">7</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="3"><span class="notranslate">21. Do you have any suggestions for improving CMT that we should pass on to its developers?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="1">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>20</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="1">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>268</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="2"><a class="TextBtn" href="21_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a></td><td class="cnt notranslate">20</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">22. With ca. 160 accepted and invited papers, the program currently fills 5 parallel tracks on three days to the limit. Should we allow the conference to grow further?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>194</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>94</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No, we already accept too many papers.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:10.3092783505155%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">10,3%</td><td class="cnt">20</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No, we should not accept more papers even if we get substantially more submissions.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:22.1649484536082%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">22,2%</td><td class="cnt">43</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Yes, but include accepted papers that will only be presented as posters.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:39.6907216494845%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">39,7%</td><td class="cnttop">77</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes, add another parallel track.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:10.8247422680412%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">10,8%</td><td class="cnt">21</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes, add another day of sessions to the program.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:17.0103092783505%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">17,0%</td><td class="cnt">33</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="22_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">Other suggestions?</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">11</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">23. This year, we invited 7 application papers, which got a free entry to the program and a slot in the proceedings. Do you think this is a good idea?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>205</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>83</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes, we should keep that.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:20.9756097560976%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">21,0%</td><td class="cnt">43</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Sounds good in principle, but I have not yet seen the papers.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:49.2682926829268%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">49,3%</td><td class="cnttop">101</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No, application papers are fine, but we do not need additional incentives for attracting them</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:17.5609756097561%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">17,6%</td><td class="cnt">36</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No, we should find another way for attracting application papers.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:12.1951219512195%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">12,2%</td><td class="cnt">25</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="23_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">Other comments?</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">9</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">24. At this year&#180;s conference, proceedings on paper, USB or CD will *not* be available, but papers can be downloaded from the Web page. Does this work for you?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>213</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>75</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>Yes.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:88.2629107981221%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">88,3%</td><td class="cnttop">188</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes, but I think it's a bad idea.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:7.981220657277%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,0%</td><td class="cnt">17</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>No.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:3.75586854460094%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">3,8%</td><td class="cnt">8</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">25. As in previous years, printed proceedings will be available from Omnipress (this year only after the conference). This service is not free (about 6$ per registration). Do you think we should still produce printed proceedings for archival purposes?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>211</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>77</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:36.4928909952607%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">36,5%</td><td class="cnt">77</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>Yes, but try to find a cheaper way.</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:13.7440758293839%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">13,7%</td><td class="cnt">29</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>No.</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:49.7630331753554%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">49,8%</td><td class="cnttop">105</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div><div style="margin-bottom:15px"><div class="rsltsmryContainer" ><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><thead><tr class="ttl"><th class="hdr" colspan="4"><span class="notranslate">26. What other conferences do you regularly attend?</span></th></tr></thead><tfoot><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><th class="answ" colspan="2">answered question</th><td class="answ notranslate"><b>164</b></td></tr><tr><td><div class="spacer">&nbsp;</div></td><th class="skip" colspan="2">skipped question</th><td class="skip notranslate"><b>124</b></td></tr></tfoot><tbody><tr><th class="dflt" colspan="2">&nbsp;</th><th class="freq">Response<br />Percent</th><th class="cnt">Response<br />Count</th></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><b><span>NIPS</span></b></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:70.1219512195122%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freqtop">70,1%</td><td class="cnttop">115</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>AIStats</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:18.9024390243902%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">18,9%</td><td class="cnt">31</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>UAI</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:18.2926829268293%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">18,3%</td><td class="cnt">30</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>COLT</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:10.9756097560976%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">11,0%</td><td class="cnt">18</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ECML/PKDD</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:31.0975609756098%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">31,1%</td><td class="cnt">51</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>SIGKDD</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:21.9512195121951%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">22,0%</td><td class="cnt">36</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ICDM</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:16.4634146341463%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">16,5%</td><td class="cnt">27</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>IJCAI</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:21.9512195121951%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">22,0%</td><td class="cnt">36</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>AAAI</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:22.5609756097561%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">22,6%</td><td class="cnt">37</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>ECAI</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:4.26829268292683%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">4,3%</td><td class="cnt">7</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>EMNLP</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:3.65853658536585%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">3,7%</td><td class="cnt">6</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>CoNLL</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:0.609756097560976%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">0,6%</td><td class="cnt">1</td></tr><tr class="notranslate"><td class="rowLabel"><span>SIGIR</span></td><td style="width:96%;white-space:nowrap;"><div class="freqbar" style="width:8.53658536585366%;"><img src="i/t.gif" height="12" alt="" /></div></td><td class="freq">8,5%</td><td class="cnt">14</td></tr><tr><td align="right" colspan="3"><a class="TextBtn" href="26_1.html"><img width="16" height="16" src="i/t.gif" alt="" class="view" />view</a><span class="notranslate">Other (please specify)</span></td><td class="cnt notranslate">31</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></body></html>