ÿþ<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Comment Summary</title><link media="all" href="css/Export.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" charset="utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><meta http-equiv="Content-Language" content="en" /></head><body style="margin-left:15px;margin-right:15px;margin-top:15px;"><a href="SurveySummary.html" class="NormBtn">&laquo; Back to Summary</a><div style="margin-top:15px;"><table class="rsltsmry" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0" border="0"><thead><tr><th class="hdr" colspan="8">Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from those at related conferences?</th></tr><tr><th class="hdr dflt">#</th><th class="hdr dflt">Response&nbsp;Date</th><th class="hdr dflt" style="width:80%;">What conference are you comparing to and what is the subject area?</th></tr></thead><tbody id="xtrows"><tr><td>1</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:01 PM</td><td>COLT, NIPS, theory, algorithms</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 7:07 PM</td><td>NIPS AISTATS</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 8:27 PM</td><td>ECML-PKDD, KDD</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 10:02 PM</td><td>ACL, NAACL: The NLPers tend to write longers reviews with more details, and be more polite.</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 10:48 PM</td><td>NIPS, Siggraph.</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 10, 2010 10:51 PM</td><td>I find NIPS marginally worse as far as craziness. COLT reviewers seem to be stronger, but their viewpoint often doesn't make sense w.r.t. what is significant work.</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 1:09 AM</td><td>ECML/PKDD</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 3:03 AM</td><td>AAAI and SDM machine learning papers</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 8:42 AM</td><td>ECML - Machine learning</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 11, 2010 1:03 PM</td><td>Again, due to variance I don't dare to generalize...</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td style="white-space:nowrap;">Jun 14, 2010 10:06 AM</td><td>KDD'09</td></tr></tbody></table></div></body></html>