1. Did you serve as an area chair at ICML 2010? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 560 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes | 4.8% | 27 | |
No | 95.2% | 533 |
2. Did you serve as a reviewer at ICML 2010? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 560 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes | 34.8% | 195 | |
No | 65.2% | 365 |
3. Are you an author of a *rejected* ICML 2010 paper? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 560 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes | 51.6% | 289 | |
No | 48.4% | 271 |
4. Are you an author of an *accepted* ICML 2010 paper? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 560 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes | 30.5% | 171 | |
No | 69.5% | 389 |
5. Are you going to attend ICML 2010 in Haifa? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 560 | ||
skipped question | 0 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes | 27.3% | 153 | |
No | 72.7% | 407 | |
viewMy main reason for not attending is: | 305 |
6. What model do you prefer for assigning area chairs to papers? (multiple selections possible) | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 460 | ||
skipped question | 100 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Authors supply area keywords, and area chairs bid on papers primarily in the areas they agreed to cover. The assignment of area chairs to areas is public to the authors. (this year's model) | 75.4% | 347 | |
Authors supply area keywords, and the system matches area chairs to papers by keyword overlap. | 18.7% | 86 | |
Authors bid on area chairs. (last year's model) | 17.0% | 78 | |
viewI have the following alternative proposal: | 3.3% | 15 |
7. What model do you prefer for assigning reviewers to papers? (multiple selections possible) | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 470 | ||
skipped question | 90 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Two-phase model mixing bidding and manual assignment. In Phase I, reviewer bidding is used to assign two reviewers to each paper. In Phase II, area chairs manually assign additional reviewers based on the Phase I reviews and the author rebuttal. (this year's model) | 60.6% | 285 | |
Two-phase model like above, but area chairs manually assign reviewers in both phases. | 17.7% | 83 | |
Single-phase model, where reviewers are assigned to papers based on their bids. | 16.8% | 79 | |
Single-phase model, where reviewers are manually assigned by the area chairs. | 11.7% | 55 | |
viewI have the following alternative proposal: | 5.7% | 27 |
8. What reviewing model do you prefer? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 473 | ||
skipped question | 87 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
double-blind (reviewers do not know the authors, and vice versa) (as this year) | 81.2% | 384 | |
single-blind (reviewers know the authors, but authors don't know the reviewers) | 12.1% | 57 | |
open (reviewers and authors know each other's identities) | 6.8% | 32 |
9. Do you think the Phase I reviews were different in quality from the Phase II reviews? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 439 | ||
skipped question | 121 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Phase I substantially better | 10.7% | 47 | |
Phase I slightly better | 15.5% | 68 | |
Both were the same | 45.1% | 198 | |
Phase II slightly better | 19.1% | 84 | |
Phase II substantially better | 9.6% | 42 |
10. Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from the reviews at previous ICMLs? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 369 | ||
skipped question | 191 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
ICML2010 substantially better | 4.6% | 17 | |
ICML2010 slightly better | 14.1% | 52 | |
About the same | 67.2% | 248 | |
Previous ICMLs slightly better | 9.2% | 34 | |
Previous ICMLs substantially better | 4.9% | 18 | |
viewAdditional comments: | 57 |
11. Do you think the ICML2010 reviews were different in quality from those at related conferences? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 427 | ||
skipped question | 133 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
ICML2010 substantially better | 11.5% | 49 | |
ICML2010 slightly better | 26.7% | 114 | |
About the same | 45.2% | 193 | |
Other conferences slightly better | 12.2% | 52 | |
Other conferences substantially better | 4.4% | 19 | |
viewWhat conference are you comparing to and what is the subject area? | 98 |
12. What do you think of early rejects by area chairs (i.e., rejecting a paper based on two reviews and author rebuttal)?㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㐀㘀㜀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㤀㌀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䤀 漀戀樀攀挀琀 琀漀 攀愀爀氀礀 爀攀樀攀挀琀猀⸀ 刀攀樀攀挀琀攀搀 瀀愀瀀攀爀猀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 最攀琀 愀琀 氀攀愀猀琀 琀栀爀攀攀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀猀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㜀⸀㔀㔀㠀㠀㠀㘀㔀 㤀㘀㌀㘀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㜀⸀㘀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㠀㈀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䤀 猀甀瀀瀀漀爀琀 攀愀爀氀礀 爀攀樀攀挀琀猀Ⰰ 戀甀琀 漀渀氀礀 椀渀 瘀攀爀礀 挀氀攀愀爀 挀愀猀攀猀 ⠀愀瀀瀀爀漀砀椀洀愀琀攀氀礀 ㌀─ 漀昀 猀甀戀洀椀猀猀椀漀渀猀 琀栀椀猀 礀攀愀爀⤀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㜀㈀⸀㘀㈀㜀㐀 㠀㤀㤀㌀㔀㜀㘀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀琀漀瀀∀㸀㜀㈀⸀㈀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀琀漀瀀∀㸀㌀㌀㜀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䄀爀攀愀 挀栀愀椀爀猀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 洀愀欀攀 洀漀爀攀 氀椀戀攀爀愀氀 甀猀攀 漀昀 攀愀爀氀礀 爀攀樀攀挀琀猀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀 ⸀㈀㜀㠀㌀㜀㈀㔀㤀 㘀㐀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀 ⸀㌀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㐀㠀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀⼀琀愀戀氀攀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀洀愀爀最椀渀ⴀ戀漀琀琀漀洀㨀㔀瀀砀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀䌀漀渀琀愀椀渀攀爀∀ 㸀㰀琀愀戀氀攀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀∀ 挀攀氀氀猀瀀愀挀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀ 挀攀氀氀瀀愀搀搀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀㸀㰀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀琀琀氀∀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀栀搀爀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㐀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㌀⸀ 圀栀愀琀 搀漀 礀漀甀 琀栀椀渀欀 漀昀 攀愀爀氀礀 愀挀挀攀瀀琀猀 ⠀椀⸀攀⸀Ⰰ 愀挀挀攀瀀琀椀渀最 愀 瀀愀瀀攀爀 愀昀琀攀爀 漀渀氀礀 琀眀漀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀猀 愀渀搀 愀甀琀栀漀爀 爀攀戀甀琀琀愀氀⤀㼀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㐀㘀㘀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㤀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀圀攀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 渀漀琀 愀氀氀漀眀 琀栀椀猀 ⠀愀猀 椀琀 眀愀猀 琀栀椀猀 礀攀愀爀⤀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㔀㤀⸀㘀㔀㘀㘀㔀㈀㌀㘀 㔀㔀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀琀漀瀀∀㸀㔀㤀⸀㜀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀琀漀瀀∀㸀㈀㜀㠀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀圀攀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 愀氀氀漀眀 琀栀椀猀 昀漀爀 瀀愀瀀攀爀猀 眀椀琀栀 攀砀挀攀瀀琀椀漀渀愀氀氀礀 最漀漀搀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀猀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㐀 ⸀㌀㐀㌀㌀㐀㜀㘀㌀㤀㐀㠀㔀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㐀 ⸀㌀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㠀㠀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀⼀琀愀戀氀攀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀洀愀爀最椀渀ⴀ戀漀琀琀漀洀㨀㔀瀀砀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀䌀漀渀琀愀椀渀攀爀∀ 㸀㰀琀愀戀氀攀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀∀ 挀攀氀氀猀瀀愀挀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀ 挀攀氀氀瀀愀搀搀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀㸀㰀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀琀琀氀∀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀栀搀爀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㐀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㐀⸀ 䐀漀 礀漀甀 琀栀椀渀欀 琀栀攀 愀甀琀栀漀爀 昀攀攀搀戀愀挀欀 栀愀猀 愀渀 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀 漀渀 琀栀攀 搀攀挀椀猀椀漀渀 漀昀 愀挀挀攀瀀琀愀渀挀攀⼀爀攀樀攀挀琀椀漀渀㼀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㐀㘀㜀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㤀㌀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀嘀攀爀礀 猀琀爀漀渀最 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㈀⸀㤀㤀㜀㠀㔀㠀㘀㜀㈀㌀㜀㘀㠀㜀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㌀⸀ ─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㐀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀匀甀戀猀琀愀渀琀椀愀氀 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㜀⸀㔀㔀㠀㠀㠀㘀㔀 㤀㘀㌀㘀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㜀⸀㘀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㠀㈀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䴀愀爀最椀渀愀氀 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㔀㤀⸀㌀㐀㜀㜀㔀㘀 㔀㤀㤀㘀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀琀漀瀀∀㸀㔀㤀⸀㌀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀琀漀瀀∀㸀㈀㜀㜀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀一漀 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㈀ ⸀㈀㠀㐀㜀㤀㘀㔀㜀㌀㠀㜀㘀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㈀ ⸀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㤀㐀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀⼀琀愀戀氀攀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀洀愀爀最椀渀ⴀ戀漀琀琀漀洀㨀㔀瀀砀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀䌀漀渀琀愀椀渀攀爀∀ 㸀㰀琀愀戀氀攀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀∀ 挀攀氀氀猀瀀愀挀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀ 挀攀氀氀瀀愀搀搀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀㸀㰀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀琀琀氀∀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀栀搀爀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㐀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㔀⸀ 圀栀攀渀 搀漀 礀漀甀 琀栀椀渀欀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 愀甀琀栀漀爀猀 戀攀 愀猀欀攀搀 琀漀 瀀爀漀瘀椀搀攀 琀栀攀椀爀 昀攀攀搀戀愀挀欀㼀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㐀㘀㘀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㤀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䄀昀琀攀爀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀 漀昀 琀栀攀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀椀渀最 瀀爀漀挀攀猀猀Ⰰ 猀漀 椀琀 挀愀渀 椀渀昀漀爀洀 琀栀攀 猀攀氀攀挀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀䤀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀 愀渀搀 椀猀 椀洀洀攀搀椀愀琀攀氀礀 愀瘀愀椀氀愀戀氀攀 搀甀爀椀渀最 琀栀攀 搀椀猀挀甀猀猀椀漀渀⸀ ⠀琀栀椀猀 礀攀愀爀✀猀 洀漀搀攀氀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㔀⸀㤀㌀㌀㌀ 㐀㜀㈀ ㌀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀琀漀瀀∀㸀㔀⸀㤀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀琀漀瀀∀㸀㈀㐀㈀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䄀昀琀攀爀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀䤀 漀昀 琀栀攀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀椀渀最 瀀爀漀挀攀猀猀Ⰰ 猀漀 愀甀琀栀漀爀猀 挀愀渀 爀攀猀瀀漀渀搀 琀漀 愀氀氀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀猀Ⰰ 渀漀琀 樀甀猀琀 琀栀攀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀猀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀⸀㔀㈀㜀㠀㤀㘀㤀㤀㔀㜀 㠀㈀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㤀⸀㔀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㤀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䄀猀欀 昀漀爀 愀甀琀栀漀爀 昀攀攀搀戀愀挀欀 戀漀琀栀 愀昀琀攀爀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀 愀渀搀 倀栀愀猀攀 䤀䤀Ⰰ 攀瘀攀渀 琀栀漀甀最栀 琀栀攀 瀀愀瀀攀爀 猀甀戀洀椀猀猀椀漀渀 搀攀愀搀氀椀渀攀 眀漀甀氀搀 渀攀攀搀 琀漀 戀攀 洀漀瘀攀搀 琀漀 䨀愀渀甀愀爀礀 㔀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㐀⸀㌀㜀㜀㘀㠀㈀㐀 ㌀㐀㌀㌀㔀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㐀⸀㐀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㘀㜀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䐀漀 渀漀琀 愀猀欀 昀漀爀 愀甀琀栀漀爀 昀攀攀搀戀愀挀欀 愀琀 愀氀氀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㜀⸀㈀㤀㘀㌀㜀㌀㌀㤀 㔀㔀㜀㤀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀㜀⸀㌀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀㌀㐀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀愀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀吀攀砀琀䈀琀渀∀ 栀爀攀昀㴀∀㔀开⸀栀琀洀氀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 眀椀搀琀栀㴀∀㘀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㘀∀ 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀瘀椀攀眀∀ ⼀㸀瘀椀攀眀㰀⼀愀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀䤀 栀愀瘀攀 琀栀攀 昀漀氀氀漀眀椀渀最 愀氀琀攀爀渀愀琀椀瘀攀 瀀爀漀瀀漀猀愀氀㨀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㘀⸀㠀㘀㘀㤀㔀㈀㜀㠀㤀㘀㤀㤀㔀㜀─㬀∀㸀㰀椀洀最 猀爀挀㴀∀椀⼀琀⸀最椀昀∀ 栀攀椀最栀琀㴀∀㈀∀ 愀氀琀㴀∀∀ ⼀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㘀⸀㤀─㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㌀㈀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀⼀琀愀戀氀攀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀洀愀爀最椀渀ⴀ戀漀琀琀漀洀㨀㔀瀀砀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀䌀漀渀琀愀椀渀攀爀∀ 㸀㰀搀椀瘀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀洀愀爀最椀渀ⴀ戀漀琀琀漀洀㨀㔀瀀砀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀䌀漀渀琀愀椀渀攀爀∀ 㸀㰀琀愀戀氀攀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀猀氀琀猀洀爀礀∀ 挀攀氀氀猀瀀愀挀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀ 挀攀氀氀瀀愀搀搀椀渀最㴀∀ ∀㸀㰀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀琀琀氀∀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀栀搀爀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㐀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㌀⸀ 䌀漀洀瀀愀爀攀搀 琀漀 漀琀栀攀爀 挀漀渀昀攀爀攀渀挀攀猀Ⰰ 栀漀眀 洀甀挀栀 攀昀昀漀爀琀 眀愀猀 椀琀 琀漀 戀攀 愀 爀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀 漀爀 愀爀攀愀 挀栀愀椀爀 昀漀爀 䤀䌀䴀䰀㈀ 㼀㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀 (Area Chairs only) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
answered question | 27 | |||||
skipped question | 0 | |||||
Response Percent | Response Count | |||||
Substantially more effort | 33,3% | 9 | ||||
About average | 7,4% | 2 | ||||
Substantially less effort | ||||||
answered question | 27 | |||||
skipped question | 0 | |||||
Response Percent | Response Count | |||||
Yes. | 33,3% | 9 | ||||
Mostly not clear. | ||||||
answered question | 27 | |||||
skipped question | 0 | |||||
very important | important | some influence | no influence | Rating Average | Response Count | |
Phase I reviews | 25,9% (7) | 22,2% (6) | 44,4% (12) | 7,4% (2) | 2,33 | 27 |
Author feedback | 0,0% (0) | 18,5% (5) | 44,4% (12) | 37,0% (10) | 3,19 | 27 |
13. How did you like your assignments in the first reviewing phase? 㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀刀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㘀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㌀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀瘀攀爀礀 椀渀琀攀爀攀猀琀椀渀最㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀⸀㜀㔀㘀 㤀㜀㔀㘀 㤀㜀㔀㘀─㬀∀㸀 | 9,8% | 16 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
good fit with my expertise | 6,1% | 10 | |||
terrible | 0,0% | 0 |
14. How did you like your assignments in the second reviewing phase? 㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀刀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㔀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀瘀攀爀礀 椀渀琀攀爀攀猀琀椀渀最㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㈀⸀㜀㘀㔀㤀㔀㜀㐀㐀㘀㠀 㠀㔀─㬀∀㸀 | 12,8% | 18 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
good fit with my expertise | 6,4% | 9 | |||
terrible | 0,0% | 0 |
15. How would you like to receive your assignment? 㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀刀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㜀 㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㈀㔀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀䄀渀 愀爀攀愀 挀栀愀椀爀 眀栀漀 欀渀漀眀猀 洀攀 猀栀漀甀氀搀 愀猀猀椀最渀 琀栀攀洀 琀漀 洀攀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㈀⸀㤀㐀㜀㘀㐀㜀 㔀㠀㠀㈀─㬀∀㸀 | 12,9% | 22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I want to bid for my papers | 51,2% | 87 | |||
Don't care | |||||
answered question | 171 | ||||
skipped question | 24 | ||||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||||
always | 33,9% | 58 | |||
never | 28,7% | 49 | |||
I don't know whether my papers had any | |||||
answered question | 168 | ||||
skipped question | 27 | ||||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||||
it changed my mind about a paper | 75,0% | 126 | |||
it was not useful | 2,4% | 4 |
18. Throughout the reviewing process, was it always clear to you what needed to be done?ऀ㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀刀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㜀 㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㈀㔀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀夀攀猀⸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㘀㘀⸀㐀㜀 㔀㠀㠀㈀㌀㔀㈀㤀㐀─㬀∀㸀 | 66,5% | 113 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Most of the time. | 0,6% | 1 | |||
ऀऀ㰀愀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀吀攀砀琀䈀琀渀∀ 栀爀攀昀㴀∀⸀⸀⼀刀攀瘀椀攀眀攀爀猀⼀㠀开⸀栀琀洀氀∀㸀 viewComments: | 7 |
25. Do you think the majority of the reviews of your paper wereऀ㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀䄀甀琀栀漀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㌀㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㤀㔀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀爀椀最栀琀 琀漀 琀栀攀 瀀漀椀渀琀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㌀⸀㐀㠀㤀㜀㌀㘀 㜀 ㌀㠀㈀─㬀∀㸀 | 13,5% | 46 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
high quality | 24,0% | 82 | |||
the reviewers did not understand my paper | |||||
answered question | 343 | ||||
skipped question | 93 | ||||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||||
too long | 77,8% | 267 | |||
too short | |||||
answered question | 348 | ||||
skipped question | 88 | ||||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||||
yes, and they took it into consideration | 18,4% | 64 | |||
I'm not sure | 7,8% | 27 |
28. Do you think that the meta reviewer (area chair) adequately summarized the reviewers' opinions and made a right decision? ऀऀ⠀䄀甀琀栀漀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀 | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 336 | ||
skipped question | 100 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
yes | 38,7% | 130 | |
no | 5,1% | 17 |
29. How do you rate the length of the meta review(s)?ऀऀ㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀䄀甀琀栀漀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㌀㌀㈀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀 㐀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀琀漀漀 氀漀渀最㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀 ⸀㤀 ㌀㘀㐀㐀㔀㜀㠀㌀㌀㈀㔀─㬀∀㸀 | 0,9% | 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
just right | 26,5% | 88 |
30. Will you submit again to a future ICML conference?ऀऀ㰀猀瀀愀渀 氀愀渀最㴀∀攀渀ⴀ甀猀∀㸀⠀䄀甀琀栀漀爀猀 漀渀氀礀⤀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀栀攀愀搀㸀㰀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀愀渀猀眀攀爀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀愀渀猀眀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㌀㐀㠀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀搀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀瀀愀挀攀爀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀搀椀瘀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀猀欀椀瀀瀀攀搀 焀甀攀猀琀椀漀渀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀猀欀椀瀀 渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㠀㠀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀⼀琀昀漀漀琀㸀㰀琀戀漀搀礀㸀㰀琀爀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀搀昀氀琀∀ 挀漀氀猀瀀愀渀㴀∀㈀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀倀攀爀挀攀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀琀栀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀挀渀琀∀㸀刀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀㰀戀爀 ⼀㸀䌀漀甀渀琀㰀⼀琀栀㸀㰀⼀琀爀㸀㰀琀爀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀渀漀琀爀愀渀猀氀愀琀攀∀㸀㰀琀搀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀爀漀眀䰀愀戀攀氀∀㸀㰀戀㸀㰀猀瀀愀渀㸀礀攀猀㰀⼀猀瀀愀渀㸀㰀⼀戀㸀㰀⼀琀搀㸀㰀琀搀 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㤀㘀─㬀眀栀椀琀攀ⴀ猀瀀愀挀攀㨀渀漀眀爀愀瀀㬀∀㸀㰀搀椀瘀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀昀爀攀焀戀愀爀∀ 猀琀礀氀攀㴀∀眀椀搀琀栀㨀㜀㘀⸀㜀㈀㐀㌀㜀㤀㌀ ㌀㐀㔀─㬀∀㸀 | 76,7% | 267 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
no | 21,0% | 73 |
32. Did you find CMT | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 411 | ||
skipped question | 149 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
great | 9.2% | 38 | |
comfortable | 39.9% | 164 | |
o.k. | 42.3% | 174 | |
clumsy | 6.6% | 27 | |
awful | 1.9% | 8 |
33. Do you have any suggestions for improving CMT that we should pass on to its developers? | ||
---|---|---|
answered question | 53 | |
skipped question | 507 | |
Response Count | ||
view | 53 |
34. With ca. 160 accepted and invited papers, the program currently fills 5 parallel tracks on three days to the limit. Should we allow the conference to grow further? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 401 | ||
skipped question | 159 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
No, we already accept too many papers. | 15.7% | 63 | |
No, we should not accept more papers even if we get substantially more submissions. | 25.7% | 103 | |
Yes, but include accepted papers that will only be presented as posters. | 31.9% | 128 | |
Yes, add another parallel track. | 11.0% | 44 | |
Yes, add another day of sessions to the program. | 15.7% | 63 | |
viewOther suggestions? | 17 |
35. This year, we invited 7 application papers, which got a free entry to the program and a slot in the proceedings. Do you think this is a good idea? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 424 | ||
skipped question | 136 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes, we should keep that. | 15.8% | 67 | |
Sounds good in principle, but I have not yet seen the papers. | 52.6% | 223 | |
No, application papers are fine, but we do not need additional incentives for attracting them | 18.6% | 79 | |
No, we should find another way for attracting application papers. | 13.0% | 55 | |
viewOther comments? | 24 |
36. At this year´s conference, proceedings on paper, USB or CD will *not* be available, but papers can be downloaded from the Web page. Does this work for you? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 436 | ||
skipped question | 124 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes. | 89.0% | 388 | |
Yes, but I think it's a bad idea. | 7.6% | 33 | |
No. | 3.4% | 15 |
37. As in previous years, printed proceedings will be available from Omnipress (this year only after the conference). This service is not free (about 6$ per registration). Do you think we should still produce printed proceedings for archival purposes? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 430 | ||
skipped question | 130 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
Yes. | 35.1% | 151 | |
Yes, but try to find a cheaper way. | 11.6% | 50 | |
No. | 53.3% | 229 |
38. What other conferences do you regularly attend? | |||
---|---|---|---|
answered question | 337 | ||
skipped question | 223 | ||
Response Percent | Response Count | ||
NIPS | 68.2% | 230 | |
AIStats | 19.3% | 65 | |
UAI | 19.3% | 65 | |
COLT | 11.6% | 39 | |
ECML/PKDD | 31.5% | 106 | |
SIGKDD | 18.4% | 62 | |
ICDM | 12.5% | 42 | |
IJCAI | 20.8% | 70 | |
AAAI | 22.8% | 77 | |
ECAI | 6.8% | 23 | |
EMNLP | 6.2% | 21 | |
CoNLL | 1.2% | 4 | |
SIGIR | 7.7% | 26 | |
viewOther (please specify) | 61 |